The difference between Entine and Jennings' eight questions
and traditional measures of social responsibility is self-regulation. Traditional measures of social responsibility
are the external factors; social responsibility, economic responsibility, and
environmental responsibility encompass the notion that there are loopholes in
the law that can be beneficial to that company.
“The history of business suggests an early emphasis on the economic and
then legal aspects and a later concern for the ethical and discretionary
aspects (Geva, 2008, p 9).
1. Does the company comply with the law?
2. Does the company have a sense of
propriety?
3. How honestly do product claims match with
reality?
4. How forthcoming is the company with
information?
5. How does the company treat its employees?
6. How does the company handle third-party
ethics issues?
7. How charitable is the company”
8. How does the company react when faced
with negative disclosures?
The
use of traditional measures such as research, surveys, rating system, and
questionnaires to name a few are geared toward a better rating for the company (Jackson
& Parsa, 2009, pp, 13-19). Whereas,
the eight questions proposed by Entine and Jennings reflect the company’s
integrity and honesty, and require those conducting the examination to look
beyond the ever-changing political issues (Jeninnings, 2012. p 104). Keeping in mind that “No company is ethically
perfect. No company, just as no individual,
is without sin or exempt from mistakes (Jennings, 2012, p 104).” The difference essentially is old school
versus new school, the world is ever-changing just as political issue are
ever-changing and no one is perfect, but at the same time being compliant with
the law, looking out for our environment and economy is every individuals and
individuals running companies to ensure our survival is the responsibility of
all.
References
Geva, A. (2008).
Three models of corporate social responsibility: interrelationships
between
theory, research, and practice. Business
and Society Review, 113(1), 1-41
Jackson, L. A.
and Parsa, H. G. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and financial
performance:
a typology for service industries. International Journal of Business
Insights & Transformation.
2( 2), 13-21. Retrieved from
44c2-9de2-
Jennings, M. M. (2012).
Business ethics case studies and selected reading. Mason,
Ohio: South-Western Cengage
Learning.
mCuLguHj9Y/s1600/Picture1.jpg
No comments:
Post a Comment